Startseite ▼ Bookkeeping
Online ▼ Sicherheits
Überprüfungs ▼
Verwaltetes
DNS ▼
Info
Bestellen/Erneuern
FAQ
AUP
Dynamic DNS Clients
Domaine konfigurieren Dyanmic DNS Update Password Netzwerk
Überwachung ▼
Enterprise
Erweiterte
Standard
Gratis Test
FAQ
Preis/Funktionszusammenfassung
Bestellen
Beispiele
Konfigurieren/Status Alarm Profile | |||
Test Kennung: | 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.803571 |
Kategorie: | Nmap NSE |
Titel: | Nmap NSE 6.01: smb-check-vulns |
Zusammenfassung: | Checks for vulnerabilities:;; - MS08-067, a Windows RPC vulnerability;; - Conficker, an infection by the Conficker worm;; - Unnamed regsvc DoS, a denial-of-service vulnerability I accidentally found in Windows 2000;; - SMBv2 exploit (CVE-2009-3103, Microsoft Security Advisory 975497);; - MS06-025, a Windows Ras RPC service vulnerability;; - MS07-029, a Windows Dns Server RPC service vulnerability;;WARNING: These checks are dangerous, and are very likely to bring down a server. These should not;be run in a production environment unless you (and, more importantly, the business) understand the;risks!;;As a system administrator, performing these kinds of checks is crucial, because a lot more damage;can be done by a worm or a hacker using this vulnerability than by a scanner. Penetration testers,;on the other hand, might not want to use this script -- crashing services is not generally a good;way of sneaking through a network.;;If you set the script parameter 'unsafe', then scripts will run that are almost (or;totally) guaranteed to crash a vulnerable system. Do NOT specify 'unsafe' in a production;environment! And that isn't to say that non-unsafe scripts will not crash a system, they're just;less likely to.;;If you set the script parameter 'safe', then script will run that rarely or never crash a;vulnerable system. No promises, though.;;MS08-067. Checks if a host is vulnerable to MS08-067, a Windows RPC vulnerability that can allow;remote code execution. Checking for MS08-067 is very dangerous, as the check is likely to crash;systems. On a fairly wide scan conducted by Brandon Enright, we determined that on average, a;vulnerable system is more likely to crash than to survive the check. Out of 82 vulnerable systems,;;SYNTAX:;;smbport: Override the default port choice. If 'smbport' is open, it's used. It's assumed;to be the same protocol as port 445, not port 139. Since it probably isn't possible to change;Windows' ports normally, this is mostly useful if you're bouncing through a relay or something.;;randomseed: Set to a value to change the filenames/service names that are randomly generated.;;smbbasic: Forces the authentication to use basic security, as opposed to 'extended security'.;Against most modern systems, extended security should work, but there may be cases;where you want to force basic. There's a chance that you'll get better results for;enumerating users if you turn on basic authentication.;;smbsign: Controls whether or not server signatures are checked in SMB packets. By default, on Windows,;server signatures aren't enabled or required. By default, this library will always sign;packets if it knows how, and will check signatures if the server says to. Possible values are:;; - 'force': Always check server signatures, even if server says it doesn't support them (will;probably fail, but is technically more secure).;; - 'negotiate': [default] Use signatures if server supports them.;; - 'ignore': Never check server signatures. Not recommended.;; - 'disable': Don't send signatures, at all, and don't check the server's. not recommended.;More information on signatures can be found in 'smbauth.lua'.;;;safe: If set, this script will only run checks that are known (or at;least suspected) to be safe.;;unsafe: If set, this script will run checks that, if the system isn't;patched, are basically guaranteed to crash something. Remember that;non-unsafe checks aren't necessarily safe either) |
Beschreibung: | Summary: Checks for vulnerabilities: - MS08-067, a Windows RPC vulnerability - Conficker, an infection by the Conficker worm - Unnamed regsvc DoS, a denial-of-service vulnerability I accidentally found in Windows 2000 - SMBv2 exploit (CVE-2009-3103, Microsoft Security Advisory 975497) - MS06-025, a Windows Ras RPC service vulnerability - MS07-029, a Windows Dns Server RPC service vulnerability WARNING: These checks are dangerous, and are very likely to bring down a server. These should not be run in a production environment unless you (and, more importantly, the business) understand the risks! As a system administrator, performing these kinds of checks is crucial, because a lot more damage can be done by a worm or a hacker using this vulnerability than by a scanner. Penetration testers, on the other hand, might not want to use this script -- crashing services is not generally a good way of sneaking through a network. If you set the script parameter 'unsafe', then scripts will run that are almost (or totally) guaranteed to crash a vulnerable system. Do NOT specify 'unsafe' in a production environment! And that isn't to say that non-unsafe scripts will not crash a system, they're just less likely to. If you set the script parameter 'safe', then script will run that rarely or never crash a vulnerable system. No promises, though. MS08-067. Checks if a host is vulnerable to MS08-067, a Windows RPC vulnerability that can allow remote code execution. Checking for MS08-067 is very dangerous, as the check is likely to crash systems. On a fairly wide scan conducted by Brandon Enright, we determined that on average, a vulnerable system is more likely to crash than to survive the check. Out of 82 vulnerable systems, SYNTAX: smbport: Override the default port choice. If 'smbport' is open, it's used. It's assumed to be the same protocol as port 445, not port 139. Since it probably isn't possible to change Windows' ports normally, this is mostly useful if you're bouncing through a relay or something. randomseed: Set to a value to change the filenames/service names that are randomly generated. smbbasic: Forces the authentication to use basic security, as opposed to 'extended security'. Against most modern systems, extended security should work, but there may be cases where you want to force basic. There's a chance that you'll get better results for enumerating users if you turn on basic authentication. smbsign: Controls whether or not server signatures are checked in SMB packets. By default, on Windows, server signatures aren't enabled or required. By default, this library will always sign packets if it knows how, and will check signatures if the server says to. Possible values are: - 'force': Always check server signatures, even if server says it doesn't support them (will probably fail, but is technically more secure). - 'negotiate': [default] Use signatures if server supports them. - 'ignore': Never check server signatures. Not recommended. - 'disable': Don't send signatures, at all, and don't check the server's. not recommended. More information on signatures can be found in 'smbauth.lua'. safe: If set, this script will only run checks that are known (or at least suspected) to be safe. unsafe: If set, this script will run checks that, if the system isn't patched, are basically guaranteed to crash something. Remember that non-unsafe checks aren't necessarily safe either) CVSS Score: 10.0 CVSS Vector: AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C |
Querverweis: |
Common Vulnerability Exposure (CVE) ID: CVE-2006-2370 BugTraq ID: 18325 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18325 Cert/CC Advisory: TA06-164A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA06-164A.html CERT/CC vulnerability note: VU#631516 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/631516 Microsoft Security Bulletin: MS06-025 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2006/ms06-025 http://www.osvdb.org/26437 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1587 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1720 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1741 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1823 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1936 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A2061 http://securitytracker.com/id?1016285 http://secunia.com/advisories/20630 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/2323 XForce ISS Database: win-rras-bo(26812) https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26812 Common Vulnerability Exposure (CVE) ID: CVE-2006-2371 BugTraq ID: 18358 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18358 Bugtraq: 20060613 High Risk Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows RASMAN Service (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/436977/100/0/threaded CERT/CC vulnerability note: VU#814644 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/814644 http://www.osvdb.org/26436 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1674 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1846 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1851 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1857 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1907 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1983 http://securityreason.com/securityalert/1096 XForce ISS Database: win-rras-rasman-bo(26814) https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/26814 Common Vulnerability Exposure (CVE) ID: CVE-2007-1748 BugTraq ID: 23470 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23470 Bugtraq: 20070415 Re: [exploits] RPC vuln in DNS Server (fwd) (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/465863/100/100/threaded Cert/CC Advisory: TA07-103A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-103A.html Cert/CC Advisory: TA07-128A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA07-128A.html CERT/CC vulnerability note: VU#555920 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/555920 HPdes Security Advisory: HPSBST02214 http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/468871/100/200/threaded HPdes Security Advisory: SSRT071422 http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2007/04/12/microsoft-security-advisory-935964-posted.aspx http://metasploit.com/svn/framework3/trunk/modules/exploits/windows/dcerpc/msdns_zonename.rb Microsoft Security Bulletin: MS07-029 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2007/ms07-029 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1228 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1017910 http://secunia.com/advisories/24871 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2007/1366 XForce ISS Database: win-dns-rpc-bo(33629) https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/33629 Common Vulnerability Exposure (CVE) ID: CVE-2008-4250 BugTraq ID: 31874 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/31874 Bugtraq: 20081026 Windows RPC MS08-067 FAQ document released (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/497808/100/0/threaded Bugtraq: 20081027 Windows RPC MS08-067 FAQ document updated (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/497816/100/0/threaded Cert/CC Advisory: TA08-297A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA08-297A.html Cert/CC Advisory: TA09-088A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-088A.html CERT/CC vulnerability note: VU#827267 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/827267 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6824 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/6841 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7104 https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/7132 HPdes Security Advisory: HPSBST02386 http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=122703006921213&w=2 HPdes Security Advisory: SSRT080164 http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1150 Microsoft Security Bulletin: MS08-067 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2008/ms08-067 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6093 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1021091 http://secunia.com/advisories/32326 http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2902 XForce ISS Database: win-server-rpc-code-execution(46040) https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/46040 Common Vulnerability Exposure (CVE) ID: CVE-2009-3103 BugTraq ID: 36299 http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36299 Bugtraq: 20090908 Regarding Microsoft srv2.sys SMB2.0 NEGOTIATE BSOD (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/506300/100/0/threaded Bugtraq: 20090909 SMB SRV2.SYS Denial of Service PoC (Google Search) http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/506327/100/0/threaded Cert/CC Advisory: TA09-286A http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286A.html CERT/CC vulnerability note: VU#135940 http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/135940 http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/9594 http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2009-09/0090.html http://blog.48bits.com/?p=510 http://g-laurent.blogspot.com/2009/09/windows-vista7-smb20-negotiate-protocol.html http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7093 http://www.reversemode.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=1 Microsoft Security Bulletin: MS09-050 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2009/ms09-050 http://osvdb.org/57799 https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A6489 http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022848 http://secunia.com/advisories/36623 XForce ISS Database: win-srv2sys-code-execution(53090) https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53090 |
Copyright | Copyright (C) 2013 NSE-Script: The Nmap Security Scanner; NASL-Wrapper: Greenbone Networks GmbH |
Dies ist nur einer von 99761 Anfälligkeitstests in unserem Testpaket. Finden Sie mehr über unsere vollständigen Sicherheitsüberprüfungen heraus. Um einen gratis Test für diese Anfälligkeit auf Ihrem System durchlaufen zu lassen, registrieren Sie sich bitte unten. |