Report Styles   Administrator | Executive Summary | Unbranded Exec. Summary
SAMPLE: SecuritySpace Audited Web Site
Report ID3
View Created On:Jan 1, 1970 00:00 GMT
Host Address(es):
Report Contents
1. Risk Classification Summary
Vulnerabilities are classified according to the risk they present to the network/host on which they are found. The following chart summarizes how the different issues we found are spread across the different risk classes. For a detailed explanation of how vulnerabilities are classified, see Appendix A: Risk Definitions
2. Baseline Comparison Control
Baselining allows you to compare the results of an audit to the results received in a previous audit. This provides for an easy way to see what is changing from one audit to the next. This section documents which audit was used as a baseline, allows you to select a different audit to use as a baseline, and allows you to mark the current audit as something that should be used when running future baseline comparisons.

Note that you have a fair bit of control over the types of baseline comparison information displayed in your report by using our Report Style Editor. The default is to display ALL test results in your current report, along with notes as to which results are different from the previous report.

According to your current report style, baseline comparisons are:Enabled
No audit could be found against which a comparison could be done according to the current baselining rules.

3. Vulnerability Category Summary
The vulnerability category summary shows how the various issues that were reported are distributed across the different test categories.

CategoryHigh  Med  Low  Other  
Fedora Local Security Checks     
SuSE Local Security Checks     
Web application abuses     
Debian Local Security Checks     
Ubuntu Local Security Checks     
Huawei EulerOS Local Security Checks     
CentOS Local Security Checks     
Red Hat Local Security Checks     
Mandrake Local Security Checks     
Windows : Microsoft Bulletins     
Product detection     
Gentoo Local Security Checks     
FreeBSD Local Security Checks     
Denial of Service     
Oracle Linux Local Security Checks     
CGI abuses     
Amazon Linux Local Security Checks     
Web Servers     
Buffer overflow     
Slackware Local Security Checks     
Conectiva Local Security Checks     
Service detection     
Mageia Linux Local Security Checks     
Turbolinux Local Security Tests     
Default Accounts     
Mac OS X Local Security Checks     
Gain a shell remotely     
Nmap NSE net     
Trustix Local Security Checks     
Nmap NSE     
JunOS Local Security Checks     
F5 Local Security Checks     
Remote file access     
Gain root remotely     
SMTP problems     
Privilege escalation     
SSL and TLS     
AIX Local Security Checks     
CGI abuses : XSS     
VMware Local Security Checks     
Palo Alto PAN-OS Local Security Checks     
FortiOS Local Security Checks     
Citrix Xenserver Local Security Checks     
Windows : User management     
Useless services     
Peer-To-Peer File Sharing     
HP-UX Local Security Checks     
Brute force attacks     
Port scanners     
Finger abuses     
Solaris Local Security Checks     
Totals:0  0  0  0  

4. Vulnerability Title Summary
5. Vulnerability Details
6. Open Ports -
Number of open ports found by port scan:-1
Appendix A: Risk Definitions
Users should note that test classifications are subjective, although we do our best to make appropriate classifications. If you spot an inconsistency, please let us know so that we can make the appropriate corrections.

AppendixB: CVE Versioning
CVE identifiers, an industry standard way of identifying tests, are maintained by Mitre. The current mapping of CVE/CAN identifiers to Test IDs is based on CVE Version Number 20211016, and CAN Version Number 20211016. These were verified on October 16, 2021 as being the latest available.

© 1998-2023 E-Soft Inc. All rights reserved.